<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 847 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272142</link>
    <description>The High Court found the CESTAT&#039;s order unsustainable due to failure to consider necessary documentary evidence and lack of notice to the assessee regarding Cenvat credit. The Court directed CESTAT to reevaluate the case, allowing the assessee to demonstrate non-liability based on a notification exempting contractors from service tax. The Court partly allowed the appeal, disposing of the matter without cost orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 847 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272142</link>
      <description>The High Court found the CESTAT&#039;s order unsustainable due to failure to consider necessary documentary evidence and lack of notice to the assessee regarding Cenvat credit. The Court directed CESTAT to reevaluate the case, allowing the assessee to demonstrate non-liability based on a notification exempting contractors from service tax. The Court partly allowed the appeal, disposing of the matter without cost orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>