<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 845 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272140</link>
    <description>Where two appellate Benches had taken contrary views on the issues in dispute, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matters for hearing by a Larger Bench to resolve the conflict. The Larger Bench is to consider and decide all issues afresh so that the inconsistency in appellate adjudication is addressed, and it was requested to do so, as far as possible, within one year given the age of the matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 845 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272140</link>
      <description>Where two appellate Benches had taken contrary views on the issues in dispute, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned orders and remitted the matters for hearing by a Larger Bench to resolve the conflict. The Larger Bench is to consider and decide all issues afresh so that the inconsistency in appellate adjudication is addressed, and it was requested to do so, as far as possible, within one year given the age of the matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>