https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272138 The court found the detention order of imported mobile phones by VATO (Enf) to be illegal and set it aside due to irregularities. The court emphasized the need for proper authorization for interception under the DVAT Act and questioned the validity of combining assessment and penalty in a single order. The assessment/penalty order issued by VATO (Enf-II) was deemed improper and set aside. The court directed VATO (Enf) to issue a final order promptly and ordered the release of the detained goods upon payment of VAT by the petitioner, ensuring a lawful resolution. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272138 The court found the detention order of imported mobile phones by VATO (Enf) to be illegal and set it aside due to irregularities. The court emphasized the need for proper authorization for interception under the DVAT Act and questioned the validity of combining assessment and penalty in a single order. The assessment/penalty order issued by VATO (Enf-II) was deemed improper and set aside. The court directed VATO (Enf) to issue a final order promptly and ordered the release of the detained goods upon payment of VAT by the petitioner, ensuring a lawful resolution. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272138