<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1045 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179378</link>
    <description>The court upheld the classification of Appy Fizz as an aerated branded soft drink for tax assessment purposes under Section 6(1)(a) of the KVAT Act, subject to a 20% tax rate. The court determined that despite containing fruit juice as a flavoring agent, the product&#039;s predominant character was that of an aerated soft drink, falling outside the scope of fruit juices listed under Entry 71 of SRO No.82/2006. The court emphasized interpreting commodities based on common or commercial understanding, dismissing reliance on orders under the Central Excise Act and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision without interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 19:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1045 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179378</link>
      <description>The court upheld the classification of Appy Fizz as an aerated branded soft drink for tax assessment purposes under Section 6(1)(a) of the KVAT Act, subject to a 20% tax rate. The court determined that despite containing fruit juice as a flavoring agent, the product&#039;s predominant character was that of an aerated soft drink, falling outside the scope of fruit juices listed under Entry 71 of SRO No.82/2006. The court emphasized interpreting commodities based on common or commercial understanding, dismissing reliance on orders under the Central Excise Act and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision without interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>