<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Shifts Burden to Revenue to Prove Undisclosed Receipts in Vatika Triangle Flat Sales Dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27519</link>
    <description>Undisclosed receipt on sale of flats/space - Sale of flats of VT [Vatika Triangle] - The burden shifted to the Revenue to show, on the basis of some reliable and tangible material, how the rate at which the flats on the second and third floors of VT was higher than that indicated in the sales register or the sale deeds themselves. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:59:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Shifts Burden to Revenue to Prove Undisclosed Receipts in Vatika Triangle Flat Sales Dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27519</link>
      <description>Undisclosed receipt on sale of flats/space - Sale of flats of VT [Vatika Triangle] - The burden shifted to the Revenue to show, on the basis of some reliable and tangible material, how the rate at which the flats on the second and third floors of VT was higher than that indicated in the sales register or the sale deeds themselves. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:59:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>