<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned: Insufficient Evidence to Support Assumptions About Loss Offsetting Bad Debt Recovery.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27513</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee’s explanation and the claim has not been rebutted by bringing any material on record except for rejecting the same on the basis of presumption and surmise that the loss has been shown purely to set off the recovery of bad debts. Thus, the penalty levied on such a disallowance cannot be upheld and same is directed to be deleted on merits. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:43:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:43:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned: Insufficient Evidence to Support Assumptions About Loss Offsetting Bad Debt Recovery.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27513</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee’s explanation and the claim has not been rebutted by bringing any material on record except for rejecting the same on the basis of presumption and surmise that the loss has been shown purely to set off the recovery of bad debts. Thus, the penalty levied on such a disallowance cannot be upheld and same is directed to be deleted on merits. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 15:43:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>