<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179367</link>
    <description>Rejection of books under section 145 requires specific defects showing that accounts are incorrect, incomplete or incapable of yielding proper income; low yield, alleged shortage in waste cotton, or the absence of a day-to-day stock register alone was held insufficient, and the addition on that basis was deleted. The disallowance of stores and spare parts expenditure was found excessive because increased consumption was explained by overhauling and restarting a closed plant, so it was reduced. The disallowance of depreciation on plant and machinery was sustained because no error in that adjustment was shown. The assessee obtained partial relief overall.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179367</link>
      <description>Rejection of books under section 145 requires specific defects showing that accounts are incorrect, incomplete or incapable of yielding proper income; low yield, alleged shortage in waste cotton, or the absence of a day-to-day stock register alone was held insufficient, and the addition on that basis was deleted. The disallowance of stores and spare parts expenditure was found excessive because increased consumption was explained by overhauling and restarting a closed plant, so it was reduced. The disallowance of depreciation on plant and machinery was sustained because no error in that adjustment was shown. The assessee obtained partial relief overall.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>