<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1109 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179364</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made under various sections of the Act regarding cash payments exceeding Rs. 20000, traveling and conveyance expenses, and marketing expenses. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing lack of evidence and reasonable decisions by the CIT(A) based on case law precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:38:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1109 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179364</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made under various sections of the Act regarding cash payments exceeding Rs. 20000, traveling and conveyance expenses, and marketing expenses. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, citing lack of evidence and reasonable decisions by the CIT(A) based on case law precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>