<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2422</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted for enhanced service tax penalties because the tax and interest had already been paid and the adjudicating authority found no suppression or intent to evade. The commentary notes that penalty was not warranted for a mere venial breach, and that only a lesser penalty had been imposed while other penalties were dropped. On that basis, recovery of the penalties was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2422</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted for enhanced service tax penalties because the tax and interest had already been paid and the adjudicating authority found no suppression or intent to evade. The commentary notes that penalty was not warranted for a mere venial breach, and that only a lesser penalty had been imposed while other penalties were dropped. On that basis, recovery of the penalties was stayed pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>