<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1721 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179356</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal (ITA 48/2014), affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief to the assessee regarding the interpretation of the third proviso to sub-section 3(c)(ii) of Section 80HHC. The Court held that reopening the assessment for the year 2000-01 based on a retrospective amendment was unjustified, emphasizing the prospective application of the amendment from the assessment year 2005-06. Additionally, the Court emphasized the importance of citing legal precedents accurately for supporting arguments, highlighting the need for adherence to legal principles in tax provisions interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1721 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179356</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal (ITA 48/2014), affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief to the assessee regarding the interpretation of the third proviso to sub-section 3(c)(ii) of Section 80HHC. The Court held that reopening the assessment for the year 2000-01 based on a retrospective amendment was unjustified, emphasizing the prospective application of the amendment from the assessment year 2005-06. Additionally, the Court emphasized the importance of citing legal precedents accurately for supporting arguments, highlighting the need for adherence to legal principles in tax provisions interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>