https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179358 The High Court, comprising S.C. Dharmadhikari and G.S. Kulkarni, JJ., found that the substantial questions of law proposed were settled in a previous judgment. The Court noted that the Tribunal had correctly applied its own order in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2005-2006 without committing any legal error. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the Tribunal's decision did not raise any substantial question of law. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:35:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179358 The High Court, comprising S.C. Dharmadhikari and G.S. Kulkarni, JJ., found that the substantial questions of law proposed were settled in a previous judgment. The Court noted that the Tribunal had correctly applied its own order in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2005-2006 without committing any legal error. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the Tribunal's decision did not raise any substantial question of law. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179358