<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272117</link>
    <description>The appeal against the remission of excise duty due to a fire in the factory was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the appeal was not maintainable before them as the issue pertained to the loss of goods due to fire. The appellant was granted liberty to file a revision application before the Revisionary Authority under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:10:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272117</link>
      <description>The appeal against the remission of excise duty due to a fire in the factory was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the appeal was not maintainable before them as the issue pertained to the loss of goods due to fire. The appellant was granted liberty to file a revision application before the Revisionary Authority under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>