<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 821 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272116</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the benefit of cenvat credit for service tax paid as consultancy fees to M/s. NABARD for preparing a project report on maize processing and dairy units. The Tribunal held that the services obtained were related to setting up a part of the factory, falling under the definition of &quot;input services.&quot; The judgment referenced a Bombay High Court decision, clarifying that activities related to business operations, including project report preparation, are eligible for cenvat credit. The demand raised under a longer period of limitation was deemed barred due to the appellant&#039;s transparent credit availing process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 821 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272116</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the benefit of cenvat credit for service tax paid as consultancy fees to M/s. NABARD for preparing a project report on maize processing and dairy units. The Tribunal held that the services obtained were related to setting up a part of the factory, falling under the definition of &quot;input services.&quot; The judgment referenced a Bombay High Court decision, clarifying that activities related to business operations, including project report preparation, are eligible for cenvat credit. The demand raised under a longer period of limitation was deemed barred due to the appellant&#039;s transparent credit availing process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>