https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272114 The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT's decision in a case involving alleged under-invoicing by the assessee in importing wood veneers from Singapore. The Revenue relied on documents from Italian customs authorities to support their claim, but the CESTAT found them inadmissible due to lack of authentication. The Supreme Court affirmed the CESTAT's ruling, dismissing the appeals and confirming that the assessable value couldn't be enhanced based on the unauthenticated documents. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:09:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272114 The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT's decision in a case involving alleged under-invoicing by the assessee in importing wood veneers from Singapore. The Revenue relied on documents from Italian customs authorities to support their claim, but the CESTAT found them inadmissible due to lack of authentication. The Supreme Court affirmed the CESTAT's ruling, dismissing the appeals and confirming that the assessable value couldn't be enhanced based on the unauthenticated documents. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272114