https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272111 Under the SARFAESI Act, a writ petition challenging enforcement measures taken in the course of Section 13 proceedings is ordinarily not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under Section 17 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The High Court noted that the appeal remedy extends to measures taken after Section 13(4), and that the alternate-remedy rule applies with greater rigour in recovery matters under special enactments. The petitioners were relegated to the Tribunal to raise all available objections, and writ interference was declined because the statutory remedy was available and adequate. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:09:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272111 Under the SARFAESI Act, a writ petition challenging enforcement measures taken in the course of Section 13 proceedings is ordinarily not maintainable where an efficacious statutory appeal lies under Section 17 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The High Court noted that the appeal remedy extends to measures taken after Section 13(4), and that the alternate-remedy rule applies with greater rigour in recovery matters under special enactments. The petitioners were relegated to the Tribunal to raise all available objections, and writ interference was declined because the statutory remedy was available and adequate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272111