<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 809 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272104</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the demand-cum-show cause notice and assessment order regarding the imposition of service tax, citing that the petitioner had already pursued appeals and review petitions under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found that the issues raised in the writ petition were already considered during the appeal process, including the jurisdictional matter. As the Supreme Court had previously rejected the petitioner&#039;s request to waive the pre-deposit amount, the court deemed the writ petition as misconceived and advised the petitioner to seek remedies within the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 809 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272104</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the demand-cum-show cause notice and assessment order regarding the imposition of service tax, citing that the petitioner had already pursued appeals and review petitions under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court found that the issues raised in the writ petition were already considered during the appeal process, including the jurisdictional matter. As the Supreme Court had previously rejected the petitioner&#039;s request to waive the pre-deposit amount, the court deemed the writ petition as misconceived and advised the petitioner to seek remedies within the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>