<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 806 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, ruling in favor of the assessee by setting aside the tax demand on reimbursed expenses and the penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The departmental appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the arguments presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 806 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, ruling in favor of the assessee by setting aside the tax demand on reimbursed expenses and the penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The departmental appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the arguments presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>