<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1570 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179329</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) could not be denied merely because construction existed on reserved amenity space; the commercial-area amendment applied to the project, but eligibility depended on whether that space was properly part of the housing project. Where the amenity space was separately earmarked in the sanctioned layout and the amenity building received separate approval, it was treated as an independent project and could not be clubbed with the housing project for testing eligibility. The assessee remained entitled to deduction on the housing project, while profit attributable to the amenity building had to be excluded from the eligible deduction computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1570 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179329</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80IB(10) could not be denied merely because construction existed on reserved amenity space; the commercial-area amendment applied to the project, but eligibility depended on whether that space was properly part of the housing project. Where the amenity space was separately earmarked in the sanctioned layout and the amenity building received separate approval, it was treated as an independent project and could not be clubbed with the housing project for testing eligibility. The assessee remained entitled to deduction on the housing project, while profit attributable to the amenity building had to be excluded from the eligible deduction computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>