<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2405</link>
    <description>The Division Bench upheld the AO&#039;s authority to issue a notice seeking further details on depreciation and foreign travel allowance, emphasizing compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. However, the court quashed the AO&#039;s order for lack of a hearing and directed a remand under section 254 for the assessee to respond to the notice. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 140 - HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2405</link>
      <description>The Division Bench upheld the AO&#039;s authority to issue a notice seeking further details on depreciation and foreign travel allowance, emphasizing compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. However, the court quashed the AO&#039;s order for lack of a hearing and directed a remand under section 254 for the assessee to respond to the notice. The appeal was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>