<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 790 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion and not on any new tangible material. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee company, allowing the deduction under Section 10A for its Mumbai unit. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee company was allowed, and the orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 790 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion and not on any new tangible material. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the assessee company, allowing the deduction under Section 10A for its Mumbai unit. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee company was allowed, and the orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>