<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 786 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that amounts retained by banks/credit card agencies were not commission but normal bank charges, exempt from TDS under Section 194H. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, and the demand raised by the AO was upheld. The decision aligned with the precedent set by the Jet Airways India Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 786 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that amounts retained by banks/credit card agencies were not commission but normal bank charges, exempt from TDS under Section 194H. The Revenue&#039;s appeals for both assessment years were dismissed, and the demand raised by the AO was upheld. The decision aligned with the precedent set by the Jet Airways India Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>