<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 779 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the cost of additional testing charges borne by customers should not be included in the assessable value. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that documentation charges for providing extra copies of drawings to customers post-manufacturing and clearance should also not be part of the assessable value. The decision, delivered on December 4, 2015, set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal based on established legal principles and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 779 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the cost of additional testing charges borne by customers should not be included in the assessable value. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that documentation charges for providing extra copies of drawings to customers post-manufacturing and clearance should also not be part of the assessable value. The decision, delivered on December 4, 2015, set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal based on established legal principles and the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>