<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179297</link>
    <description>The court advised the petitioner to approach the issuing authority to understand the real intention behind the summons and present the Kerala High Court judgment for consideration. No coercive measures were to be taken by the authorities until this process was completed. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. The other writ petitions were disposed of based on the judgment in the first writ petition as the issues were identical.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1390 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179297</link>
      <description>The court advised the petitioner to approach the issuing authority to understand the real intention behind the summons and present the Kerala High Court judgment for consideration. No coercive measures were to be taken by the authorities until this process was completed. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly. The other writ petitions were disposed of based on the judgment in the first writ petition as the issues were identical.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>