<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT,  RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2400</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee must get accounts audited as combined receipts exceeded Rs.40 lakhs. The assessee&#039;s bona fide belief regarding Section 44AB interpretation constituted a reasonable cause, exempting him from penalty under Section 271B. Emphasizing against penalties for minor law breaches, the court set aside penalties imposed by Assessing Officer, CIT (Appeals), and Tribunal, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT,  RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2400</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee must get accounts audited as combined receipts exceeded Rs.40 lakhs. The assessee&#039;s bona fide belief regarding Section 44AB interpretation constituted a reasonable cause, exempting him from penalty under Section 271B. Emphasizing against penalties for minor law breaches, the court set aside penalties imposed by Assessing Officer, CIT (Appeals), and Tribunal, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>