<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 517 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179279</link>
    <description>When a disciplinary authority disagrees with an enquiry officer&#039;s favourable findings, it must issue tentative reasons, give the delinquent officer an effective opportunity to respond, and independently reassess the record before imposing penalty. Failure to consider the representation and to evaluate the evidence afresh breaches natural justice, particularly where the enquiry officer had exonerated the officer and the investigating agency had filed a closure report. On the facts described, the dismissal and consequential orders were unsustainable, and the matter required reconsideration afresh with consideration of the representation and a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 517 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179279</link>
      <description>When a disciplinary authority disagrees with an enquiry officer&#039;s favourable findings, it must issue tentative reasons, give the delinquent officer an effective opportunity to respond, and independently reassess the record before imposing penalty. Failure to consider the representation and to evaluate the evidence afresh breaches natural justice, particularly where the enquiry officer had exonerated the officer and the investigating agency had filed a closure report. On the facts described, the dismissal and consequential orders were unsustainable, and the matter required reconsideration afresh with consideration of the representation and a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>