<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed issues concerning the validity of assessments, addition of unexplained creditors, and legality of notices under the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the lack of incriminating evidence to support additions by the assessing officer, leading to deletion of such additions. The appellant&#039;s arguments were partially allowed based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed issues concerning the validity of assessments, addition of unexplained creditors, and legality of notices under the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the lack of incriminating evidence to support additions by the assessing officer, leading to deletion of such additions. The appellant&#039;s arguments were partially allowed based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>