https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179274 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer's reference to the Valuation Officer under Section 55A was invalid. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the long term capital loss declared by the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A). The appeal was pronounced in favor of the assessee based on the invalidity of the AO's reference to the DVO and the acceptance of the declared long term capital loss. en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:03:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179274 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the Assessing Officer's reference to the Valuation Officer under Section 55A was invalid. The Tribunal directed the AO to accept the long term capital loss declared by the assessee, setting aside the order of the CIT(A). The appeal was pronounced in favor of the assessee based on the invalidity of the AO's reference to the DVO and the acceptance of the declared long term capital loss. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179274