https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272061 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders due to the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A). The appellant, a manufacturer facing financial difficulties, argued against penalties under Rule 25, citing precedents and the invalidity of the rule. The Tribunal, aligning with High Court judgments, relieved the appellant from duty payment and penalties, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional principles in excise duty matters. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272061 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders due to the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A). The appellant, a manufacturer facing financial difficulties, argued against penalties under Rule 25, citing precedents and the invalidity of the rule. The Tribunal, aligning with High Court judgments, relieved the appellant from duty payment and penalties, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional principles in excise duty matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272061