<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 761 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand and penalty imposition against the appellant company, including the penalty on its Director, due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine manufacture and clearance of products. The case lacked concrete proof, such as details of transport, payment, manufacturing process, or buyers, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 761 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand and penalty imposition against the appellant company, including the penalty on its Director, due to insufficient evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine manufacture and clearance of products. The case lacked concrete proof, such as details of transport, payment, manufacturing process, or buyers, leading to the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>