https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272035 The Tribunal held that the objection raised by the Registry regarding court fee payment for the assessee's appeals was not maintainable. Appeals dismissed by Ld. CIT(A) for non-payment of admitted tax were deemed infructuous for the A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal allowed appeals for other years where seized cash exceeded the admitted tax, directing verification of facts by the A.O. The Tribunal emphasized that denial of a hearing is not permissible under Section 249(4)(a) of the I.T. Act when tax is paid or adjusted from seized assets. Appeals for certain years were allowed for statistical purposes, while one appeal was dismissed as infructuous. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 08:51:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272035 The Tribunal held that the objection raised by the Registry regarding court fee payment for the assessee's appeals was not maintainable. Appeals dismissed by Ld. CIT(A) for non-payment of admitted tax were deemed infructuous for the A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal allowed appeals for other years where seized cash exceeded the admitted tax, directing verification of facts by the A.O. The Tribunal emphasized that denial of a hearing is not permissible under Section 249(4)(a) of the I.T. Act when tax is paid or adjusted from seized assets. Appeals for certain years were allowed for statistical purposes, while one appeal was dismissed as infructuous. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272035