<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 732 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT-A&#039;s decision, directing the computation of capital gain under sec 45(2) read with sec 2(47)(iv) for the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of fair market value at the conversion time and upheld the principles of relevant case laws. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition by the AO treating the income as business income was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 732 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT-A&#039;s decision, directing the computation of capital gain under sec 45(2) read with sec 2(47)(iv) for the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of fair market value at the conversion time and upheld the principles of relevant case laws. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition by the AO treating the income as business income was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>