https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2385 The High Court allowed the original petition, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessments. The court held that the change in the written down value due to appellate orders for preceding years necessitated a recomputation of depreciation for the relevant years. It concluded that the mistake in the written down value was a consequence of the appellate order, requiring adjustments in assessments and depreciation calculations based on the revised written down value. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2385 The High Court allowed the original petition, setting aside the impugned orders and directing the Assessing Officer to modify the assessments. The court held that the change in the written down value due to appellate orders for preceding years necessitated a recomputation of depreciation for the relevant years. It concluded that the mistake in the written down value was a consequence of the appellate order, requiring adjustments in assessments and depreciation calculations based on the revised written down value. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2385