https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179263 Cenvat credit validly taken on inputs when final products were dutiable did not have to be reversed merely because the final products later became exempt under Notification No. 30/2004-CE. The dispute concerned credit on inputs in stock, work-in-progress and finished goods, and the matter was treated as covered by an earlier identical Tribunal decision, making the Revenue's contrary authorities inapplicable. On those facts, reversal of credit was not warranted and the refund claim was sustainable. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:28:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179263 Cenvat credit validly taken on inputs when final products were dutiable did not have to be reversed merely because the final products later became exempt under Notification No. 30/2004-CE. The dispute concerned credit on inputs in stock, work-in-progress and finished goods, and the matter was treated as covered by an earlier identical Tribunal decision, making the Revenue's contrary authorities inapplicable. On those facts, reversal of credit was not warranted and the refund claim was sustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179263