<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1083 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179249</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessee companies did not have a contractual right to receive interest from M/s. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. The advances were made from interest-free funds, and interest income cannot be presumed to have accrued without a contract and certainty of recovery. The issue of disallowance of interest expenditure was to be re-examined by the Assessing Officer to determine if the advances were made from borrowed funds. The tribunal set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1083 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179249</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the assessee companies did not have a contractual right to receive interest from M/s. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. The advances were made from interest-free funds, and interest income cannot be presumed to have accrued without a contract and certainty of recovery. The issue of disallowance of interest expenditure was to be re-examined by the Assessing Officer to determine if the advances were made from borrowed funds. The tribunal set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Assessing Officer, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The appeals of the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>