<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 877 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179252</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh determination, instructing a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present their case. The appeal was allowed via remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration regarding the eligibility of CENVAT Credit based on the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s certificate for goods imported from 2006-2008. Both parties agreed on the need for verification by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 877 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179252</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh determination, instructing a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present their case. The appeal was allowed via remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration regarding the eligibility of CENVAT Credit based on the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s certificate for goods imported from 2006-2008. Both parties agreed on the need for verification by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>