<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order due to the violation of a CBDT circular, which led to the scrutiny of the respondent-assessee&#039;s return. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal affirmed that CBDT circulars are binding on Income-tax Department officers. As no substantial question of law was found, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 53 - HIGH COURT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment order due to the violation of a CBDT circular, which led to the scrutiny of the respondent-assessee&#039;s return. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal affirmed that CBDT circulars are binding on Income-tax Department officers. As no substantial question of law was found, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>