<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 706 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed depreciation on goodwill and expenditure capitalized as revenue expenditure, as well as additional depreciation on new machinery. However, it upheld the disallowance of depreciation on the amount paid for infrastructure development to SIPCOT, as the assets were not owned by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 19th February 2016 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:44:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 706 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed depreciation on goodwill and expenditure capitalized as revenue expenditure, as well as additional depreciation on new machinery. However, it upheld the disallowance of depreciation on the amount paid for infrastructure development to SIPCOT, as the assets were not owned by the assessee. The decision was pronounced on 19th February 2016 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>