<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 701 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained due to the defective show cause notice under Section 274. The orders imposing penalty were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal did not address other arguments on the merits of the penalty orders, as the defect in the show cause notice was sufficient to decide the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:43:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 701 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained due to the defective show cause notice under Section 274. The orders imposing penalty were cancelled, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal did not address other arguments on the merits of the penalty orders, as the defect in the show cause notice was sufficient to decide the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>