<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 700 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme 2000 was not meant to meet the cost of fixed assets and should not be reduced from the asset value for depreciation purposes. The Tribunal quashed the order under section 263, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 700 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme 2000 was not meant to meet the cost of fixed assets and should not be reduced from the asset value for depreciation purposes. The Tribunal quashed the order under section 263, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>