<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify and determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price by aggregating the extended credit facility with other transactions and using the LIBOR rate. The Tribunal dismissed grounds not raised before the Dispute Resolution Panel, emphasizing adherence to legal principles in computing deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify and determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price by aggregating the extended credit facility with other transactions and using the LIBOR rate. The Tribunal dismissed grounds not raised before the Dispute Resolution Panel, emphasizing adherence to legal principles in computing deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>