https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271987 The Authority admitted the application despite objections raised by the Revenue regarding proposed services for foreign clients and the presence of a sister concern. The Revenue argued against the admissibility of the proposed services, citing the company's tax return filings since 2011 and connections to a sister concern. However, the applicant clarified the lack of actual activity despite filing returns, supported by legal precedents including a Gujarat High Court judgment and a previous ruling by the Authority. Ultimately, the Authority accepted the application based on the absence of actual activity and legal interpretations from previous judgments. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271987 The Authority admitted the application despite objections raised by the Revenue regarding proposed services for foreign clients and the presence of a sister concern. The Revenue argued against the admissibility of the proposed services, citing the company's tax return filings since 2011 and connections to a sister concern. However, the applicant clarified the lack of actual activity despite filing returns, supported by legal precedents including a Gujarat High Court judgment and a previous ruling by the Authority. Ultimately, the Authority accepted the application based on the absence of actual activity and legal interpretations from previous judgments. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271987