<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 636 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed penalties of Rs. 5,000 each under Rule 27 for each show cause notice due to default in duty payment and failure to substantiate duty payment from PLA. The Commissioner (Appeals) was required to follow Tribunal directions on penalty imposition, setting aside penalties under Rule 25 and confirming penalties under Rule 27. The case emphasized adherence to legal provisions and previous Tribunal decisions in determining penalty imposition for default in duty payment and utilization of cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 636 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed penalties of Rs. 5,000 each under Rule 27 for each show cause notice due to default in duty payment and failure to substantiate duty payment from PLA. The Commissioner (Appeals) was required to follow Tribunal directions on penalty imposition, setting aside penalties under Rule 25 and confirming penalties under Rule 27. The case emphasized adherence to legal provisions and previous Tribunal decisions in determining penalty imposition for default in duty payment and utilization of cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>