<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 635 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the matters to the assessing officers for fresh consideration. Key directives included verifying capitation fee collections, reassessing eligibility for exemptions under Section 11, and determining depreciation on capital assets. The Tribunal stressed the need for clear evidence to support claims for exemptions and contributions towards the corpus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 635 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals for statistical purposes, remitting the matters to the assessing officers for fresh consideration. Key directives included verifying capitation fee collections, reassessing eligibility for exemptions under Section 11, and determining depreciation on capital assets. The Tribunal stressed the need for clear evidence to support claims for exemptions and contributions towards the corpus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>