https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179210 A writ challenge was found inappropriate where earlier PIL proceedings had already been disposed of with liberty to pursue the proper statutory forums; grievances against the Debt Recovery Tribunal and labour-related issues were to be taken before the respective appellate or labour fora. The sale of the company's assets and the settlement with creditors and workmen were not invalidated for breach of the BIFR restraint order, because they followed a tripartite arrangement and joint settlement process and no surviving grievance was shown. Under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, a representative union's settlement within the statutory framework binds all workmen, including non-members, and cannot be displaced by an individual challenge. en-us Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179210 A writ challenge was found inappropriate where earlier PIL proceedings had already been disposed of with liberty to pursue the proper statutory forums; grievances against the Debt Recovery Tribunal and labour-related issues were to be taken before the respective appellate or labour fora. The sale of the company's assets and the settlement with creditors and workmen were not invalidated for breach of the BIFR restraint order, because they followed a tripartite arrangement and joint settlement process and no surviving grievance was shown. Under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, a representative union's settlement within the statutory framework binds all workmen, including non-members, and cannot be displaced by an individual challenge. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179210