<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1176 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179209</link>
    <description>Available Cenvat credit may be used to discharge duty crystallised later in settlement proceedings where no express prohibition exists, and the majority treated even credit from another unit as usable in the circumstances, noting departmental knowledge and no timely objection. On interest, the liability had to be recomputed on the settled duty amount, but the cash deposit already made could not be adjusted against interest, which had to be paid in cash subject to verification. A dissent took the view that Cenvat credit is factory-specific and that credit from another unit could not be used.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1176 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179209</link>
      <description>Available Cenvat credit may be used to discharge duty crystallised later in settlement proceedings where no express prohibition exists, and the majority treated even credit from another unit as usable in the circumstances, noting departmental knowledge and no timely objection. On interest, the liability had to be recomputed on the settled duty amount, but the cash deposit already made could not be adjusted against interest, which had to be paid in cash subject to verification. A dissent took the view that Cenvat credit is factory-specific and that credit from another unit could not be used.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=179209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>