https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271976 The appellants cleared goods under composite contracts and faced duty demands on the additional value of goods sold from the depot. They calculated assessable value deducting various components and paid duty at 5%/8%. The Revenue sought higher rates. The Tribunal found the assessable value needed revision for goods manufactured and remanded the matter for determining liability based on the factory gate value, rejecting the Revenue's demand for higher duty rates. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271976 The appellants cleared goods under composite contracts and faced duty demands on the additional value of goods sold from the depot. They calculated assessable value deducting various components and paid duty at 5%/8%. The Revenue sought higher rates. The Tribunal found the assessable value needed revision for goods manufactured and remanded the matter for determining liability based on the factory gate value, rejecting the Revenue's demand for higher duty rates. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271976