<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 670 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271965</link>
    <description>The appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order related to the interpretation of section 244A and the treatment of interest portion of refunds were dismissed. The Court held that the issues were previously settled in favor of the Respondent by earlier decisions, and no substantial question of law arose. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of precedents on similar legal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 670 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271965</link>
      <description>The appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order related to the interpretation of section 244A and the treatment of interest portion of refunds were dismissed. The Court held that the issues were previously settled in favor of the Respondent by earlier decisions, and no substantial question of law arose. The judgment emphasized the binding nature of precedents on similar legal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>