<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271960</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition on account of disallowance of loss in trading of foam and fabrics. The tribunal found that the AO had failed to properly investigate the evidence presented by the appellant and had relied on the original assessment order without considering the submissions made. The ITAT concluded that the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was valid, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence in assessments for fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:22:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271960</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the deletion of the addition on account of disallowance of loss in trading of foam and fabrics. The tribunal found that the AO had failed to properly investigate the evidence presented by the appellant and had relied on the original assessment order without considering the submissions made. The ITAT concluded that the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was valid, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence in assessments for fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>