<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 662 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271957</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of bad debts and the disallowance under section 14A while directing the deletion of the repair and maintenance expenditure disallowance. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims and applying relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:22:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 662 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271957</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of bad debts and the disallowance under section 14A while directing the deletion of the repair and maintenance expenditure disallowance. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims and applying relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>