<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT Five-Member Bench clarifies service tax applicability on works contracts before June 1, 2007, dismissing misstatement allegations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27445</link>
    <description>Demand of service tax - there was a great deal of confusion whether works contracts were vivisectable and liable to service tax prior to 01.06.2007, so much so that the issue was thus decided by the Larger Five-Member Bench of CESTAT in the case of L&amp;T - allegation of wilful misstatement / suppression of facts not sustainable - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:35:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:35:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=417287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT Five-Member Bench clarifies service tax applicability on works contracts before June 1, 2007, dismissing misstatement allegations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27445</link>
      <description>Demand of service tax - there was a great deal of confusion whether works contracts were vivisectable and liable to service tax prior to 01.06.2007, so much so that the issue was thus decided by the Larger Five-Member Bench of CESTAT in the case of L&amp;T - allegation of wilful misstatement / suppression of facts not sustainable - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:35:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>